Model comparison
Holo3.1-4B vs Qwen3.7 Max
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-4B unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo3.1-4B and Qwen3.7 Max share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3.1-4B; 58 to Qwen3.7 Max.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3.1-4B only
- 1
- Qwen3.7 Max only
- 58
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Holo3.1-4B and Qwen3.7 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-4B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo3.1-4B | Qwen3.7 Max | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo3.1-4B$0 input / $0 output | Qwen3.7 MaxNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo3.1-4BNot available | Qwen3.7 MaxNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo3.1-4BNot available | Qwen3.7 MaxNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo3.1-4B262K | Qwen3.7 Max1M | Qwen3.7 Max lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic22 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-4B | Qwen3.7 Max | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AndroidWorldSource | 71.0% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 69.7% | Not comparable |
| QwenClawBenchSource | — | 64.3% | Not comparable |
| QwenWebBenchSource | — | 1568 | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
| BFCL v4Source | — | 75.0% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 76.4% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 47.9% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 53.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 30.6% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 94.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 38.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1273 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 64.27% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 18.7% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 908 | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 25.6% | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 45.0% | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 42.5% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 50.8% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 74.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 83.4% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-4B | Qwen3.7 Max | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 80.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 60.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 78.3% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 53.5% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 91.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 69.7% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 66.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 48.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-4B | Qwen3.7 Max | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 92.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 92.4% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 89.6% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 95% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 73.6% | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 46.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 92.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 38.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 14.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 30.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 22.9% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual5 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-4B | Qwen3.7 Max | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1293 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Holo3.1-4B and Qwen3.7 Max on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Holo3.1-4B and Qwen3.7 Max today?
Holo3.1-4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.7 Max: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.