Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3-35B-A3B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
H Company
74/100
Margin
69.0pts
← winning
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Holo3-35B-A3B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3-35B-A3B; 4 to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3-35B-A3B only
1
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3-35B-A3B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3-35B-A3BQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3-35B-A3B64KQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct128KQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3-35B-A3BQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 82.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3-35B-A3BQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
AA-SciCodeSource 27.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHolo3-35B-A3BQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 41.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3-35B-A3B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3-35B-A3B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct today?

Holo3-35B-A3B: Pricing unavailable Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.