Agentic
Directional only- Hy3 Preview
- 54.4
- Inkling-Small
- 70.1
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Model comparison
Hy3 Preview vs Inkling-Small
Updated July 30, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
5 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
The category averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so they are directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
The category averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so they are directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
1 Hy3 Preview only
5 Shared
15 Inkling-Small only
- Shared results
- 5
- Hy3 Preview only
- 1
- Inkling-Small only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
3 categories use different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Coding
Directional only- Hy3 Preview
- 74.4
- Inkling-Small
- 62.4
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 3 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Knowledge
Directional only- Hy3 Preview
- 87.2
- Inkling-Small
- 53.4
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Reasoning
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- Inkling-Small
- 40.1
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- Inkling-Small
- 92.9
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- Inkling-Small
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- Inkling-Small
- 76.6
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- Inkling-Small
- 82.2
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Hy3 Preview | Inkling-Small | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 54.4 | 70.1 | Directional only1 vs 2 rows | Directional only |
| Coding | 74.4 | 62.4 | Directional only1 vs 3 rows | Directional only |
| Knowledge | 87.2 | 53.4 | Directional only1 vs 2 rows | Directional only |
| Reasoning | Not measured | 40.1 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | 92.9 | Not comparable0 vs 2 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | 76.6 | Not comparable0 vs 2 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | 82.2 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic
SWE-bench Verified
Coding
GPQA
Knowledge
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Inkling-Small
- $0.0013
- Fits in one request
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Inkling-Small
- $0.03332
- Fits in one request
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Inkling-Small
- $0.0492
- Fits in one request
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationHy3 PreviewInkling-Small
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Hy3 Preview
256K
Inkling-Small
1M
API model ID
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
Inkling-Small
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Hy3 Preview
No comparable hosted API rate
Inkling-Small
$0.116 per 1M cached input tokens
Documented inputs
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
Inkling-Small
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
Inkling-Small
Not sourced
Provider availability
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
Inkling-Small
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Hy3 Preview
Reasoning
Inkling-Small
Hybrid
Weight access
Hy3 Preview
Open Weight
Inkling-Small
Open Weight
License
Hy3 Preview
Open Weight
Inkling-Small
Open Weight
Release date
Hy3 Preview
2026-04-23
Inkling-Small
2026-07-30
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Inkling-Small has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence21 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Hy3 Preview54.4%SourceInkling-Small64.7%SourceInkling-Small leads this result
Gert Labs
Hy3 Preview36.91%SourceInkling-Small—Not directly comparable
BrowseComp
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small77.4%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small79.6%SourceNot directly comparable
Toolathlon-Verified
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small54.4%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
Hy3 Preview74.4%SourceInkling-Small80.2%SourceInkling-Small leads this result
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Hy3 Preview54.4%SourceInkling-Small64.7%SourceInkling-Small leads this result
SWE-bench Pro
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small55.9%SourceNot directly comparable
SciCode
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small48.7%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
Knowledge
GPQA
Hy3 Preview87.2%SourceInkling-Small89.5%SourceInkling-Small leads this result
GPQA-D
Hy3 Preview87.2%SourceInkling-Small89.5%SourceInkling-Small leads this result
HLE
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small47.8%SourceNot directly comparable
HLE w/o tools
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small31.6%SourceNot directly comparable
Math
Multimodal
Instruction following
IFBench
Hy3 Preview—Inkling-Small82.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Inkling-Small?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or Inkling-Small?
The current coding averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so BenchLM does not name a winner from them. Read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or Inkling-Small?
The current agentic tasks averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so BenchLM does not name a winner from them. Read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which costs less, Hy3 Preview or Inkling-Small?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Hy3 Preview or Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated July 30, 2026
Watch Hy3 Preview vs Inkling-Small
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.