Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Hy3 Preview
59
Laguna M.1
44
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+13.7 difference
Coding
+3.6 difference
Hy3 Preview
Laguna M.1
$0 / $0
$0.2 / $0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
256K
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 59 to 44. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Hy3 Preview's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 54.4 against 40.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 54.4% to 40.7%.
Laguna M.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.20 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3 Preview. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 44. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 54.4% and 40.7%.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 56.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.4 versus 40.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.