Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Hy3 Preview
62
Laguna XS.2
32
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna XS.2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+24.3 difference
Coding
+6.7 difference
Hy3 Preview
Laguna XS.2
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
131K
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna XS.2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Hy3 Preview's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 54.4 against 30.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 54.4% to 30.1%.
Hy3 Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 131K for Laguna XS.2.
Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 54.4% and 30.1%.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 53.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.4 versus 30.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.