Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Hy3 Preview
62
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
87
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Agentic
+14.0 difference
Coding
+2.8 difference
Knowledge
+1.3 difference
Hy3 Preview
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$0 / $0
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
1M
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 54.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 25.5% to 48%. Hy3 Preview does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 25.5% and 48%.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 48 versus 46.7. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 57.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 54.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.