Coding
Like-for-like- Hy3 Preview
- 74.4
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- 73.4
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Hy3 Preview leads
Model comparison
Hy3 Preview vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Updated August 7, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the higher public score estimate, 53.1 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.
2 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Hy3 Preview
Hy3 Preview leads on the same 1 weighted benchmark row.
Confidence: limited
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
4 Hy3 Preview only
2 Shared
2 MiMo-V2-Flash only
- Shared results
- 2
- Hy3 Preview only
- 4
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 2
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 / 8
1 category uses different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Knowledge
Directional only- Hy3 Preview
- 87.2
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- 84.7
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Agentic
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- 54.4
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Hy3 Preview
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Hy3 Preview | MiMo-V2-Flash | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 74.4 | 73.4 | Like-for-like1 vs 1 rows | Hy3 Preview leads |
| Knowledge | 87.2 | 84.7 | Directional only1 vs 2 rows | Directional only |
| Agentic | 54.4 | Not measured | Not comparable1 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
GPQA
Knowledge
SWE-bench Verified
Coding
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. MiMo-V2-Flash has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. MiMo-V2-Flash has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Hy3 Preview
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- MiMo-V2-Flash
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. MiMo-V2-Flash has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationHy3 PreviewMiMo-V2-Flash
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Hy3 Preview
256K
MiMo-V2-Flash
256K
API model ID
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Flash
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Hy3 Preview
No comparable hosted API rate
MiMo-V2-Flash
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Flash
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Flash
Not sourced
Provider availability
Hy3 Preview
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Flash
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Hy3 Preview
Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash
Reasoning
Weight access
Hy3 Preview
Open Weight
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open Weight
License
Hy3 Preview
Open Weight
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open Weight
Release date
Hy3 Preview
2026-04-23
MiMo-V2-Flash
2026-03-15
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- MiMo-V2-Flash has the higher public score estimate, 53.1 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 256K.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence8 rows
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Hy3 Preview or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the higher public score estimate, 53.1 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.
Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Hy3 Preview leads the like-for-like coding comparison across 1 shared weighted benchmark row.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or MiMo-V2-Flash?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Hy3 Preview or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Hy3 Preview or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Both models list the same context window, 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 7, 2026
Watch Hy3 Preview vs MiMo-V2-Flash
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.