Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Hy3 Preview
62
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
47
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Coding
+6.5 difference
Knowledge
+28.8 difference
Inst. Following
+11.1 difference
Hy3 Preview
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
256K
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 47. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Hy3 Preview's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 60 against 53.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 87.2% to 72.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 47. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87.2% and 72.2%.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 46.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 53.5. Inside this category, SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 74.2 versus 63.1. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.