Model comparison
Hy3 Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: Hy3 Preview not scored; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Hy3 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 13 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Hy3 Preview; 15 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- Hy3 Preview only
- 9
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 15
- Comparable categories
- 3 / 8
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 53 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Hy3 Preview's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 57.8 against 32. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 87.2% to 72.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Hy3 Preview | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Hy3 Preview33.8 | Margin→ 42.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.4 |
| Coding | Hy3 Preview57.8 | Margin← 25.8 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Inst. Following | Hy3 Preview63.1 | Margin→ 11.1 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
| Agentic | Hy3 Preview54.4 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Hy3 PreviewNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 87.2%B 72.2%Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 15GPQA: Hy3 Preview scored 87.2%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
IFBench
Inst. FollowingA 63.1%B 74.2%Winner: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔ 11.1IFBench: Hy3 Preview scored 63.1%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 74.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SciCode
CodingA 41.2%B 32%Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 9.2SciCode: Hy3 Preview scored 41.2%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 32%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Hy3 Preview$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Hy3 PreviewNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Hy3 PreviewNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Hy3 Preview256K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 36.91% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 30.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 35.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1214 | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorldSource | — | 47.4% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 45.3% | Not comparable |
CodingHy3 Preview wins7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 74.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | 41.2% | 32% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 47.6% | 27.8% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 58.8% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v5Source | — | 63.2% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 8.3% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 41.2% | 14.9% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| GPQASource | 87.2% | 72.2% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.2% | 72.2% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| HLESource | 25.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 31.5% | 14.8% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 73.0% | 83.1% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.7% | 46.9% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA-HLESource | 31.6% | 5.3% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -18.5% | -56.0% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 77.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | — | 90.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 53.2% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 53 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87.2% and 72.2%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Hy3 Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.4 versus 33.8. Inside this category, AA-GPQA Diamond is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 57.8 versus 32. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for instruction following, Hy3 Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 74.2 versus 63.1. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.