Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Hy3 Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 21 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
67.22/100
0 category wins4 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Hy3 Preview unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus share 21 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Hy3 Preview; 48 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
21
Hy3 Preview only
1
Qwen3.7 Plus only
48
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Hy3 Preview makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Qwen3.7 Plus is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 21 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryHy3 PreviewΔQwen3.7 Plus
KnowledgeHy3 Preview33.8Margin→ 26.3Qwen3.7 Plus60.1
Inst. FollowingHy3 Preview63.1Margin→ 21.4Qwen3.7 Plus84.5
CodingHy3 Preview57.8Margin→ 17.8Qwen3.7 Plus75.6
AgenticHy3 Preview54.4Margin→ 17.3Qwen3.7 Plus71.7
ReasoningHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus91.7
MathHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultilingualHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4
MultimodalHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus81.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Hy3 PreviewB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. IFBench

    Inst. Following
    Source ↗
    A 63.1%B 79.1%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 16
    IFBench: Hy3 Preview scored 63.1%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 79.1%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  2. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 54.4%B 70.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 15.9
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Hy3 Preview scored 54.4%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 70.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  3. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 41.2%B 51.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 10.1
    SciCode: Hy3 Preview scored 41.2%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 51.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  4. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 25.5%B 34.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 9.2
    HLE: Hy3 Preview scored 25.5%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 34.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  5. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 74.4%B 77.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 3.3
    SWE-bench Verified: Hy3 Preview scored 74.4%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 77.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHy3 Preview$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHy3 PreviewNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHy3 PreviewNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHy3 Preview256KQwen3.7 Plus1MQwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%70.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gert LabsSource 36.91%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.7%20.8%Hy3 Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 35.7%21.8%Hy3 Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 1214936Hy3 Preview leads
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —93%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.4%77.7%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%70.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
SciCodeSource 41.2%51.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 47.6%45.5%Hy3 Preview leads
AA Coding IndexSource 58.8%55.9%Hy3 Preview leads
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-LCRSource 66.7%65.0%Hy3 Preview leads
CritPtSource 4.9%9.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 41.2%39.0%Hy3 Preview leads
GPQASource 87.2%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQA-DSource 87.2%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
HLESource 25.5%34.7%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.5%22.2%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.0%25.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.7%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-HLESource 31.6%33.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.5%2.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMLU-ProSource —88.5%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
CharXivSource —85.9%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —79.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —80.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusResult
IFBenchSource 63.1%79.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —78.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.1 versus 33.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.6 versus 57.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.7 versus 54.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 63.1. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Tencent Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.