Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Updated October 5, 2026. Rank says Hy3 is ahead. Price, access, and your workload can each overturn that. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision reading
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead. 0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
- Shared results
- 0
- Hy3 only
- 0
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only
- 41
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Estimated: Hy3 and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limitedAgentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limitedChat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-ratesCache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-ratesRepository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
49.3Hy334.7Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Directional only · BenchAlign v5.8
Hy3 has the higher coding point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
Same basis rules as the category table below
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
41 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only
3 categories rest on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Directional only- Hy3
- 34.6
- Supported · #71/119
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 28.7
- Estimated · #83/119
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 11 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Coding
Directional only- Hy3
- 49.3
- Supported · #42/144
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 34.7
- Estimated · #78/144
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 6 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Knowledge
Directional only- Hy3
- 49.6
- Estimated · #66/171
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 41.9
- Estimated · #96/171
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 5 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Reasoning
Not comparable- Hy3
- 76.6
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 71.6
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Hy3
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 51.0
- #37/49
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Hy3
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Hy3
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 76.8
- #57/125
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Hy3
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- 70.7
- Unranked · 5 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 34.6Supported · #71/119 | 28.7Estimated · #83/119 | Directional onlyBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 11 public rows | Directional only |
| Coding | 49.3Supported · #42/144 | 34.7Estimated · #78/144 | Directional onlyBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 6 public rows | Directional only |
| Knowledge | 49.6Estimated · #66/171 | 41.9Estimated · #96/171 | Directional onlyBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 5 public rows | Directional only |
| Reasoning | 76.6Unranked · 2 rankable rows | 71.6Unranked · 2 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not ranked | 51.0#37/49 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | 76.8#57/125 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | 70.7Unranked · 5 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Hy3
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Hy3
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Hy3
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationHy3Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Hy3
256K
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
262K
API model ID
Hy3
Not sourced
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Hy3
No comparable hosted API rate
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Hy3
Not sourced
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Hy3
Not sourced
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Hy3
Not sourced
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Hy3
Reasoning
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Reasoning
Weight access
Hy3
Open Weight
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Open Weight
License
Hy3
Open Weight
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Open Weight
Release date
Hy3
2026-07-06
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
2026-04-15
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the larger documented window (262K).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Questions
Which is better, Hy3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Hy3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Hy3 scores higher for coding on the public lane, 49.3 to 34.7. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for coding from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Hy3 scores higher for agentic tasks on the public lane, 34.6 to 28.7. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic tasks, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for agentic tasks from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which costs less, Hy3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Hy3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the larger documented context window: 262K, compared with 256K.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence41 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B51.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Claw-Eval
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B68.7%SourceNot directly comparable
QwenClawBench
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B52.6%SourceNot directly comparable
QwenWebBench
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B1397SourceNot directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B67.2%SourceNot directly comparable
VITA-Bench
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B35.6%SourceNot directly comparable
DeepPlanning
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B25.9%SourceNot directly comparable
Toolathlon
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B26.9%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B62.8%SourceNot directly comparable
WideResearch
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B60.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Gert Labs
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B42.65%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B73.4%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE Multilingual
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B67.2%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B49.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B51.5%SourceNot directly comparable
LiveCodeBench
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B80.4%SourceNot directly comparable
NL2Repo
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B29.4%SourceNot directly comparable
Multimodal
MMMU
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B81.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMU-Pro
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B75.3%SourceNot directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B85.3%SourceNot directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B89.9%SourceNot directly comparable
CharXiv
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B78%SourceNot directly comparable
SimpleVQA
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B58.9%SourceNot directly comparable
CC-OCR
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B81.9%SourceNot directly comparable
AI2D_TEST
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B92.7%SourceNot directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B92.0%SourceNot directly comparable
ODINW13
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B50.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B86.6%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B82.5%SourceNot directly comparable
VideoMMMU
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B83.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B86.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Knowledge
Math
HMMT Feb 2025
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B90.7%SourceNot directly comparable
HMMT Nov 2025
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B89.1%SourceNot directly comparable
HMMT Feb 2026
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B83.6%SourceNot directly comparable
MMAnswerBench
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B78.9%SourceNot directly comparable
AIME26
Hy3—Qwen3.6-35B-A3B92.7%SourceNot directly comparable
41 public results · 0 shared
Watch Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 5,500+ readers.
Last updated October 5, 2026