Skip to main content

Model comparison

Hy3 vs Fugu Cyber

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Tencent
55.64/100
No comparison
Sakana AI
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Hy3 #80 (Estimated); Fugu Cyber unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Hy3 and Fugu Cyber share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Hy3; 2 to Fugu Cyber.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Hy3 only
14
Fugu Cyber only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Hy3 and Fugu Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Fugu Cyber is priced at $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3. Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHy3Fugu CyberComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHy3$0 input / $0 outputFugu Cyber$6 input / $36 outputHy3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHy3Not availableFugu CyberNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHy3Not availableFugu CyberNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHy3256KFugu Cyber1MFugu Cyber lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHy3Fugu CyberResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 35.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1214Not comparable
CyberGymSource 86.9%Not comparable
CTI-REALMSource 72.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHy3Fugu CyberResult
AA-SciCodeSource 47.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHy3Fugu CyberResult
AA-LCRSource 66.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 4.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHy3Fugu CyberResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 41.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 31.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHy3Fugu CyberResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1229Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Hy3 and Fugu Cyber on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Hy3 and Fugu Cyber today?

Hy3: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.