Model comparison
Inkling vs Llama 3.1 405B
Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; Llama 3.1 405B unranked
BenchAlign evidence: Inkling not scored; Llama 3.1 405B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to Inkling; 3 to Llama 3.1 405B.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 9
- Inkling only
- 23
- Llama 3.1 405B only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Inkling is priced at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 3.1 405B. Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Llama 3.1 405B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Inkling | Δ | Llama 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Inkling69.4 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
| Coding | Inkling68.6 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
| Knowledge | Inkling51.7 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
| Math | Inkling97.1 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Inkling76.5 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Inkling79.8 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Inkling | Llama 3.1 405B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Llama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 output | Llama 3.1 405B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | InklingNot available | Llama 3.1 405B29 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | InklingNot available | Llama 3.1 405B2.19 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Inkling1M | Llama 3.1 405B128K | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 77.1% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 74.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | 1258 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 32.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 36.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1239 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 836 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 23.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 19% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 46% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 30% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 40.7% | 8.5% | Inkling leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.2% | 51.5% | Inkling leads |
| AA-HLESource | 29.7% | 4.2% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 2.1% | -17.3% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 40.0% | 22.3% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 63.1% | 51.0% | Llama 3.1 405B leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | 97.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B today?
Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.