Agentic
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- 42.2
- Estimated · #106/152
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct vs LFM2.5-230M
Updated September 10, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
2 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.
Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct and LFM2.5-230M are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. LFM2.5-230M does not fit this workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-230M has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. LFM2.5-230M does not fit this workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-230M has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
1 Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct only
2 Shared
4 LFM2.5-230M only
- Shared results
- 2
- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct only
- 1
- LFM2.5-230M only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Coding
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- 33.6
- Estimated · #168/183
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 3 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Not ranked
- LFM2.5-230M
- 9.7
- #122/123
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct | LFM2.5-230M | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not ranked | 42.2Estimated · #106/152 | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not ranked | 33.6Estimated · #168/183 | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 3 public rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | 9.7#122/123 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
IFBench
Instruction following
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct: 34.7%LFM2.5-230M: 38.4%Normalized gap 3.7Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct source LFM2.5-230M source
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- LFM2.5-230M
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-230M has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
- LFM2.5-230M
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. LFM2.5-230M does not fit this workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-230M has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- LFM2.5-230M
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. LFM2.5-230M does not fit this workload in one request. Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-230M has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationKanana-2 1.3B InstructLFM2.5-230M
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
LFM2.5-230M
32K
API model ID
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
kakaocorp/kanana-2-1.3b-instruct
Kakao Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct model cardLFM2.5-230M
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
No comparable hosted API rate
Kakao Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct model cardLFM2.5-230M
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Not sourced
LFM2.5-230M
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Not sourced
LFM2.5-230M
Not sourced
Provider availability
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Not sourced
LFM2.5-230M
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Non-Reasoning
LFM2.5-230M
Non-Reasoning
Weight access
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Open Weight
LFM2.5-230M
Open Weight
License
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
Open Weight
LFM2.5-230M
Open Weight
Release date
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct
2026-07-24
LFM2.5-230M
2026-06-25
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 32K.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct or LFM2.5-230M?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct or LFM2.5-230M?
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct and LFM2.5-230M are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct or LFM2.5-230M?
Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct or LFM2.5-230M?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct or LFM2.5-230M?
Both models list the same context window, 32K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 10, 2026
Watch Kanana-2 1.3B Instruct vs LFM2.5-230M
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.