Skip to main content

Kimi 2.6 vs MiMo-V2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Kimi 2.6

83

VS

MiMo-V2.5

74

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Kimi 2.6 #5 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked

Pick Kimi 2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Kimi 2.6
73.1vs65.8

+7.3 difference

Coding

Kimi 2.6
72vs56.1

+15.9 difference

Multimodal

Kimi 2.6
79.4vs77.9

+1.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Kimi 2.6

MiMo-V2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0.4 / $2

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi 2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Kimi 2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 74. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi 2.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 58.6% to 56.1%.

MiMo-V2.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi 2.6. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi 2.6.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Kimi 2.6 or MiMo-V2.5?

Kimi 2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 74. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 58.6% and 56.1%.

Which is better for coding, Kimi 2.6 or MiMo-V2.5?

Kimi 2.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 56.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Kimi 2.6 or MiMo-V2.5?

Kimi 2.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 65.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Kimi 2.6 or MiMo-V2.5?

Kimi 2.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.4 versus 77.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.