Model comparison
Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.6 #13; Nemotron 3 Super 100B unranked
Evidence parity. Kimi K2.6 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 59 results are unique to Kimi K2.6; 0 to Nemotron 3 Super 100B.
Updated July 13, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Kimi K2.6 only
- 59
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Kimi K2.6 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Kimi K2.6 is priced at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Kimi K2.6 | Δ | Nemotron 3 Super 100B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Kimi K2.673.5 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Super 100BNot measured |
| Coding | Kimi K2.672.6 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Super 100BNot measured |
| Knowledge | Kimi K2.642.2 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Super 100BNot measured |
| Math | Kimi K2.667.1 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Super 100BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Kimi K2.679.8 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Super 100BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Kimi K2.6$0.95 input / $4 output | Nemotron 3 Super 100B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Kimi K2.6Not available | Nemotron 3 Super 100B367 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Kimi K2.6Not available | Nemotron 3 Super 100B0.71 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Kimi K2.6256K | Nemotron 3 Super 100B1M | Nemotron 3 Super 100B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic22 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 83.2% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 73.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 50% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 55.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | 62.3% | 5.5% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| DeepSearchQASource | 92.5% | — | Not comparable |
| WideResearchSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 30.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | 95.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 34.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1190 | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 28.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 56.82% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 18.0% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 4.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 809 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 19.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 38.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 0.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 31.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 20.6% | — | Not comparable |
Coding13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 80.2% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | 89.6% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | 89.6% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 58.6% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 76.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | 52.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 37.89% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench31Source | 47.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 61.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 43.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 53.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | 65.9% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 34.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 44.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 91.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 35.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 32.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 39.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math5 benchmarks
Multimodal7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | 79.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource | 80.1% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 80.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
| V*Source | 96.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1318 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 76.0% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Kimi K2.6 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Kimi K2.6 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B today?
Kimi K2.6: $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Super 100B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.