Skip to main content

Kimi K2.6 vs Sakana Fugu Ultra

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Kimi K2.6

80

VS

Sakana Fugu Ultra

100

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.6 #13 · Sakana Fugu Ultra unranked

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2.6 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Sakana Fugu Ultra
73.1vs82.1

+9.0 difference

Coding

Sakana Fugu Ultra
72vs83.5

+11.5 difference

Knowledge

Sakana Fugu Ultra
53.8vs95.5

+41.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Kimi K2.6

Sakana Fugu Ultra

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.95 / $4

$5 / $30

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2.6 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 80. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 95.5 against 53.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 66.7% to 82.1%.

Sakana Fugu Ultra is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.6. That is roughly 7.5x on output cost alone. Sakana Fugu Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 66.7% and 82.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 53.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 72. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 73.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Kimi K2.6
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Sakana Fugu Ultra
API / mo$26,250
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.