Skip to main content

Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs o4-mini (high)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
59.35/100
Margin
9.4pts
← winning
49.98/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated); o4-mini (high) #118 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and o4-mini (high) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning); 2 to o4-mini (high).

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
27
o4-mini (high) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and o4-mini (high) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o4-mini (high) has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputo4-mini (high)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableo4-mini (high)161 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableo4-mini (high)21.94 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128Ko4-mini (high)200Ko4-mini (high) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 32.58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 25.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1009Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 49.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 46.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
AA-LCRSource 65.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 35.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 29.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -8.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 24.828%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 6.250%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1279Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and o4-mini (high) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and o4-mini (high) today?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens o4-mini (high): Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.