Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.0-397B
Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Laguna M.1 and Ornith-1.0-397B share 5 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Laguna M.1; 2 to Ornith-1.0-397B.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 5
- Laguna M.1 only
- 0
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Laguna M.1 makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Ornith-1.0-397B is the better fit if agentic is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Laguna M.1 and Ornith-1.0-397B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Laguna M.1 | Δ | Ornith-1.0-397B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Laguna M.145.8 | Margin→ 31.7 | Ornith-1.0-397B77.5 |
| Coding | Laguna M.164.8 | Margin→ 9.8 | Ornith-1.0-397B74.6 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 45.8%B 77.5%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 31.7Terminal-Bench 2.0: Laguna M.1 scored 45.8%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 77.5%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 49.2%B 62.2%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 13SWE-bench Pro: Laguna M.1 scored 49.2%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 62.2%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 74.6%B 82.4%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 7.8SWE-bench Verified: Laguna M.1 scored 74.6%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 82.4%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Laguna M.1 | Ornith-1.0-397B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Laguna M.1Not available | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Laguna M.1Not available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Laguna M.1Not available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Laguna M.1256K | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticOrnith-1.0-397B wins2 benchmarks
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins5 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Laguna M.1 or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Laguna M.1 and Ornith-1.0-397B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Laguna M.1 or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 64.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Laguna M.1 or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 45.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.