Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Laguna M.1
46
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
65
Verified leaderboard positions: Laguna M.1 unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #8
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+15.4 difference
Coding
+15.6 difference
Laguna M.1
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
131K
262K
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 46. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 56.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 40.7% to 49.4%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 131K for Laguna M.1.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 46. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 40.7% and 49.4%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 56.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.1 versus 40.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.