Skip to main content

Model comparison

Laguna S 2.1 vs Mistral Small 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Poolside
N/A
No comparison
46.23/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Laguna S 2.1 unranked (Not scored); Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Laguna S 2.1 and Mistral Small 4 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to Laguna S 2.1; 16 to Mistral Small 4.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Laguna S 2.1 only
6
Mistral Small 4 only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Laguna S 2.1 and Mistral Small 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Small 4 is priced at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens for Laguna S 2.1. Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLaguna S 2.1$0.1 input / $0.2 outputMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputLaguna S 2.1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondLaguna S 2.1Not availableMistral Small 4175 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLaguna S 2.1Not availableMistral Small 40.64 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLaguna S 2.11MMistral Small 4256KLaguna S 2.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%Not comparable
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource 49.7%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 59.4%Not comparable
deepSweSource 40.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
AA-LCRSource 44.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Mistral Small 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Laguna S 2.1 and Mistral Small 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Laguna S 2.1 and Mistral Small 4 today?

Laguna S 2.1: $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Laguna S 2.1
API / mo$225
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.