Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
N/A
No comparison
77.44/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Laguna S 2.1 unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 share 3 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Laguna S 2.1; 36 to Muse Spark 1.1.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
3
Laguna S 2.1 only
3
Muse Spark 1.1 only
36
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Laguna S 2.1 makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Muse Spark 1.1 is the better fit if agentic is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
CategoryLaguna S 2.1ΔMuse Spark 1.1
AgenticLaguna S 2.170.2Margin→ 10.2Muse Spark 1.180.4
CodingLaguna S 2.159.4Margin→ 2.1Muse Spark 1.161.5
KnowledgeLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark 1.162.1
MultimodalLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark 1.188.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Laguna S 2.1B · Muse Spark 1.1

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 70.2%B 80%
    Winner: Muse Spark 1.1Δ 9.8
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Laguna S 2.1 scored 70.2%; Muse Spark 1.1 scored 80%. Muse Spark 1.1 wins this benchmark.

  2. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 59.4%B 61.5%
    Winner: Muse Spark 1.1Δ 2.1
    SWE-bench Pro: Laguna S 2.1 scored 59.4%; Muse Spark 1.1 scored 61.5%. Muse Spark 1.1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLaguna S 2.1$0.1 input / $0.2 outputMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLaguna S 2.1Not availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLaguna S 2.1Not availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLaguna S 2.11MMuse Spark 1.11MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticMuse Spark 1.1 wins
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%80%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource 49.7%—Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —88.1%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource —75.6%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —80.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource —84.9%Not comparable
CyberGymSource —59.0%Not comparable
Finance Agent v2Source —57.2%Not comparable
deepSweSource —53.3%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —14.2%Not comparable
JobBenchSource —54.7%Not comparable
CybenchSource —92.9%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource —0.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —37.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —43.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1374Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —863Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —42.8%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —93.1%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource —25.2%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —77.9%Not comparable
CodingMuse Spark 1.1 wins
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%80.0%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
SWE MultilingualSource 78.5%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 59.4%61.5%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
deepSweSource 40.4%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —71.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —58.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Result
MRCR 1MSource —54.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —63.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource —15.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Result
HLESource —62.1%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —52.2%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource —59.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —50.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —89.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —45.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —18.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —40.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —38.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1Result
CharXivSource —88.4%Not comparable
BabyVisionSource —76.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1299Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 61.5 versus 59.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 70.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Poolside Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.