Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
N/A
No comparison
72.84/100
1 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Laguna S 2.1 unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Max share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Laguna S 2.1; 54 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
4
Laguna S 2.1 only
2
Qwen3.7 Max only
54
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Laguna S 2.1 makes more sense if agentic is the priority; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if coding is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Max finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryLaguna S 2.1ΔQwen3.7 Max
CodingLaguna S 2.159.4Margin→ 18.5Qwen3.7 Max77.9
AgenticLaguna S 2.170.2Margin← 0.5Qwen3.7 Max69.7
ReasoningLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max90.4
KnowledgeLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max64.2
MathLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max97.1
MultilingualLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0
Inst. FollowingLaguna S 2.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max84.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Laguna S 2.1B · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 59.4%B 60.6%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 1.2
    SWE-bench Pro: Laguna S 2.1 scored 59.4%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 60.6%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 70.2%B 69.7%
    Winner: Laguna S 2.1Δ 0.5
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Laguna S 2.1 scored 70.2%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 69.7%. Laguna S 2.1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLaguna S 2.1$0.1 input / $0.2 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLaguna S 2.1Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLaguna S 2.1Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLaguna S 2.11MQwen3.7 Max1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticLaguna S 2.1 wins
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%69.7%Laguna S 2.1 leads
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource 49.7%—Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —53.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —30.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —94.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —38.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1273Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —64.27%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —908Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —45.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —50.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —74.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —83.4%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 70.2%69.7%Laguna S 2.1 leads
SWE MultilingualSource 78.5%78.3%Laguna S 2.1 leads
SWE-bench ProSource 59.4%60.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
deepSweSource 40.4%—Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —80.4%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —53.5%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —66.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —48.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
CritPtSource —13.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —69.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
GPQASource —92.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —92.4%Not comparable
HLESource —41.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —89.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —46.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —92.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —38.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —14.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —30.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —22.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1293Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 MaxResult
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —80.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Max are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.9 versus 59.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Laguna S 2.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.2 versus 69.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Poolside Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.