Nemotron 3 Nano 30B vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 45 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 63.7 against 42.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 49 to 17.

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

39.6

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

38
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
43
BrowseComp
37
39
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

22

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

49
HumanEval
17
26
SWE-bench Verified
10
16
LiveCodeBench
9
27
SWE-bench Pro
7

Multimodal & Grounded

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

45.2

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

38
MMMU-Pro
27
54
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

54

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

54
SimpleQA
29
52
MuSR
31
72
BBH
67
51
LongBench v2
39
51
MRCRv2
42

Knowledge

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

43.8

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

57
MMLU
27
56
GPQA
26
54
SuperGPQA
24
52
OpenBookQA
22
65
MMLU-Pro
51
1
HLE
2
54
FrontierScience
31

Instruction Following

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

78

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

72

78
IFEval
72

Multilingual

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

71.8

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

75
MGSM
62
70
MMLU-ProX
60

Mathematics

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

63.7

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

42.3

57
AIME 2023
28
59
AIME 2024
30
58
AIME 2025
29
53
HMMT Feb 2023
24
55
HMMT Feb 2024
26
54
HMMT Feb 2025
25
56
BRUMO 2025
27
73
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is ahead overall, 45 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 49 and 17.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 43.8 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 22 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 63.7 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 54 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 39.6 versus 34.1. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 45.2 versus 32.4. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.8 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.