Model comparison
LFM2.5-8B-A1B vs Llama 4 Scout
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated; Llama 4 Scout supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Llama 4 Scout share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to LFM2.5-8B-A1B; 7 to Llama 4 Scout.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
- 6
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Δ | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | LFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Llama 4 Scout | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 output | Llama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | Llama 4 Scout128 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | Llama 4 Scout0.70 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B128K | Llama 4 Scout10M | Llama 4 Scout lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 51.3% | 58.7% | Llama 4 Scout leads |
| AA-HLESource | 6.9% | 4.3% | LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -33.3% | -52.4% | LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 9.4% | 14.6% | Llama 4 Scout leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 47.0% | 78.3% | LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 8.3% | 10.0% | Llama 4 Scout leads |
Math4 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Llama 4 Scout today?
LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.