Model comparison
LFM2.5-8B-A1B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated; MiMo-V2.5-Pro supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-8B-A1B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to LFM2.5-8B-A1B; 18 to MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
- 6
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 18
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Δ | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4 |
| Coding | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2 |
| Knowledge | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0 |
| Math | LFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot measured |
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 output | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B128K | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFCL v4Source | 49.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 16.1% | 94.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1265 | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 72.9% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 68.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 29.1% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 38.3% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 2.4% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 62.70% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 873 | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 38.2% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 4.5% | 43.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 7.8% | 50.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 57.2% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 68.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 60.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 51.3% | 86.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 6.9% | 33.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -33.3% | 3.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 9.4% | 22.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 47.0% | 24.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 8.3% | 42.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| HLESource | — | 48% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 34% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 38.9% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1302 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare LFM2.5-8B-A1B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro today?
LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.