Skip to main content

Model comparison

LFM2.5-8B-A1B vs Mistral Small 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.25/100
Margin
4.8pts
winning →
46.09/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated; Mistral Small 4 estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Mistral Small 4 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to LFM2.5-8B-A1B; 5 to Mistral Small 4.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Mistral Small 4 only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Mistral Small 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Small 4 is priced at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-8B-A1B. Mistral Small 4 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Mistral Small 4
CategoryLFM2.5-8B-A1BΔMistral Small 4
MathLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4Not measured
Inst. FollowingLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableMistral Small 4175 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableMistral Small 40.64 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KMistral Small 4256KMistral Small 4 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 16.1%41.2%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
Terminal-Bench HardSource 4.5%17.4%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 7.8%38.0%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
AA-LCRSource 0.0%44.7%Mistral Small 4 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.3%Mistral Small 4 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.3%76.9%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-HLESource 6.9%9.5%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -33.3%-29.9%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 9.4%22.1%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 47.0%66.8%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 8.3%19.6%Mistral Small 4 leads
Math
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLFM2.5-8B-A1BMistral Small 4Result
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 55.6%48.2%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Mistral Small 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Mistral Small 4 today?

LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

LFM2.5-8B-A1B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.