Model comparison
LFM2.5-8B-A1B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-8B-A1B #166 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 12 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to LFM2.5-8B-A1B; 26 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
- 5
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 26
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. LFM2.5-8B-A1B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Nemotron 3 Ultra is the better fit if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Nemotron 3 Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8 | Margin→ 12.9 | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
| Agentic | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Knowledge | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra53.8 |
| Math | LFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Multilingual | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
IFBench
Inst. FollowingA 56.5%B 81.7%Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 25.2IFBench: LFM2.5-8B-A1B scored 56.5%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 81.7%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-8B-A1BNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-8B-A1B128K | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFCL v4Source | 49.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 16.1% | 83.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 7.8% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 51.3% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 6.9% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -33.3% | -0.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 9.4% | 21.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 47.0% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 8.3% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-8B-A1B | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1131 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, LFM2.5-8B-A1B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
LFM2.5-8B-A1B and Nemotron 3 Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for instruction following, LFM2.5-8B-A1B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 68.8. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.