Model comparison
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract; 17 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
- 3
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 17
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Knowledge | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Multimodal | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 1.0% | 14.9% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 28.9% | 46.9% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 5.1% | 5.3% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -83.9% | -56.0% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 5.2% | 14.8% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 94.0% | 83.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 77.3% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource | 99.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Liquid Extract F1Source | 99.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource | 90.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 26.5% | 53.2% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | — | 90.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B today?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.