Model comparison
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract; 27 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
- 4
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 27
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Knowledge | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra53.8 |
| Multilingual | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128K | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 8.5% | 83.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 3.0% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 1.0% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 28.9% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 5.1% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -83.9% | -0.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 5.2% | 21.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 94.0% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?
Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.