Skip to main content

Model comparison

LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs Qwen3.5 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
47.65/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.5 Flash #134 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Qwen3.5 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract; 2 to Qwen3.5 Flash.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
15
Qwen3.5 Flash only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Qwen3.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableQwen3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.4 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableQwen3.5 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableQwen3.5 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128KQwen3.5 Flash1MQwen3.5 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 8.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
AA-SciCodeSource 3.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -83.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 5.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 6.207%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 90.6%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 26.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractQwen3.5 FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 33.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Qwen3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and Qwen3.5 Flash today?

Qwen3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.