Skip to main content

Model comparison

LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract vs Muse Spark

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
71.04/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract and Muse Spark share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract; 39 to Muse Spark.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract only
3
Muse Spark only
39
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract and Muse Spark is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Muse Spark has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract128KMuse Spark262KMuse Spark lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 91.5%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 74.8%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 43.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 63.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1144Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.4%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 80.0%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 19.67%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 51.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 42.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 69.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 11.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
GPQA-DSource 89.5%Not comparable
HLESource 50.4%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.8%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 42.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 52.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 43.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 39.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 4.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 44.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 39.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 14.600%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 98.9%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 98.8%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 84.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 86.4%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 80.4%Not comparable
ERQASource 64.7%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 71.3%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 84.1%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 33.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 78.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractMuse SparkResult
AA-IFBenchSource 75.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract and Muse Spark on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.