Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

LFM2.5-VL-450M vs Step 3.7 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
50.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-VL-450M unranked (Not scored); Step 3.7 Flash #110 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-450M and Step 3.7 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-450M; 29 to Step 3.7 Flash.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
LFM2.5-VL-450M only
7
Step 3.7 Flash only
29
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-450M and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Step 3.7 Flash is priced at $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-VL-450M. Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-450M.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLFM2.5-VL-450M$0 input / $0 outputStep 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 outputLFM2.5-VL-450M has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondLFM2.5-VL-450MNot availableStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLFM2.5-VL-450MNot availableStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLFM2.5-VL-450M128KStep 3.7 Flash256KStep 3.7 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
BFCL v4Source 21.1%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —59.5%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource —75.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource —92.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —25.9%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource —49.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —67.1%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —47.2%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —51.57%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —21.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —98.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1017Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —14.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
SWE-bench ProSource —56.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —59.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —39.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —40.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-LCRSource —63.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource —2.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
GPQASource 25.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 19.3%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —30.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —80.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —19.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-37.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
MMMUSource 32.7%—Not comparable
RealWorldQASource 58.4%—Not comparable
CountBenchSource 73.3%—Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —79.2%Not comparable
V*Source —95.3%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —75.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1211Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLFM2.5-VL-450MStep 3.7 FlashResult
IFEvalSource 61.2%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —67.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-450M and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for LFM2.5-VL-450M and Step 3.7 Flash today?

LFM2.5-VL-450M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

LiquidAI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.