Skip to main content

Model comparison

Llama 3.1 405B vs Nemotron Ultra 253B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

51.71/100
Margin
7.3pts
← winning
44.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Llama 3.1 405B #102 (Estimated); Nemotron Ultra 253B #150 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Llama 3.1 405B and Nemotron Ultra 253B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Llama 3.1 405B; 0 to Nemotron Ultra 253B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
Llama 3.1 405B only
0
Nemotron Ultra 253B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Llama 3.1 405B and Nemotron Ultra 253B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 3.1 405B has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Nemotron Ultra 253B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLlama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron Ultra 253B$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondLlama 3.1 405B29 tok/sNemotron Ultra 253BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLlama 3.1 405B2.19 sNemotron Ultra 253BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLlama 3.1 405B128KNemotron Ultra 253B32KLlama 3.1 405B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 19%11.4%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Coding
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 29.9%34.7%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BResult
AA-LCRSource 24.3%7.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 8.5%9.1%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.5%72.8%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-HLESource 4.2%8.1%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -17.3%-45.5%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.3%19.9%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.0%81.7%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BNemotron Ultra 253BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.0%38.2%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Llama 3.1 405B and Nemotron Ultra 253B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Llama 3.1 405B and Nemotron Ultra 253B today?

Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron Ultra 253B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.