Skip to main content

Model comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs o3-pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

39.87/100
Margin
8.5pts
winning →
OpenAI
48.33/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported); o3-pro #127 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Llama 4 Scout and o3-pro share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Llama 4 Scout; 0 to o3-pro.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
2
Llama 4 Scout only
16
o3-pro only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Llama 4 Scout and o3-pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o3-pro is priced at $20.00 input / $80.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 200K for o3-pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLlama 4 Scouto3-proComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputo3-pro$20 input / $80 outputLlama 4 Scout has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondLlama 4 Scout128 tok/so3-pro27 tok/sLlama 4 Scout has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLlama 4 Scout0.70 so3-pro84.93 sLlama 4 Scout reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLlama 4 Scout10Mo3-pro200KLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 15.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 90Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
AA Coding IndexSource 8.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 17.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
AA-LCRSource 25.8%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 10.0%32.5%o3-pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 58.7%84.5%o3-pro leads
AA-HLESource 4.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -52.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 52.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 780Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLlama 4 Scouto3-proResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Llama 4 Scout and o3-pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Llama 4 Scout and o3-pro today?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens o3-pro: $20.00 input / $80.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
o3-pro
API / mo$75,000
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.