Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
LongCat-2.0
80
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
84
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LongCat-2.0 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+2.4 difference
Coding
+2.3 difference
LongCat-2.0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$0.75 / $2.95
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LongCat-2.0 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 84 to 80. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 70.8% and 68.4%.
LongCat-2.0 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 59.5 versus 57.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
LongCat-2.0 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.8 versus 68.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.