Skip to main content
Radar

Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.

Follow model changes

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Decision reading

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.

4 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Meituan logo
Model A
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Meituan

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Prism ML logo
Model B
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism ML

50.78/100

Estimated · Public rank #122

90% interval 40.960.6

Updated September 18, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.

Share or export

Share on XLinkedInSocial cardCSVJSON

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls
  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.

    Confidence: limited

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
4
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse only
13
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B only
17
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
49.9
Estimated · #59/154
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 4 vs 3 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
49.9
Estimated · #64/154
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 4 vs 4 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
73.9
Unranked · 1 rankable row
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
50.6
Estimated · #78/184
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 5 vs 3 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
76.8
Unranked · 4 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 2 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Not ranked
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
71.0
#64/124
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has no comparable published API token rate. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has no comparable published API token rate. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has no comparable published API token rate. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Documented inputs

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Not sourced

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Not sourced

Documented outputs

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Not sourced

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Not sourced

Provider availability

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Not sourced

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Reasoning

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Reasoning

Weight access

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Open Weight

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Open Weight

License

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

Open Weight

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Open Weight

Release date

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

2026-07-31

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

2026-09-17

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the larger documented window (1M).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence34 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse33.7%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • VITA-Bench

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse21.7%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse45.6%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse48.6%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • τ²-bench results

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B80.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BFCL v3

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B74.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B52.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • SWE-bench Verified

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse68.2%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B60.8%
    Source

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse leads this result

  • SWE-bench Pro

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse40.6%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE Multilingual

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse59.3%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse33.7%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench v6

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B90.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BigCodeBench

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B58.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B52.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • MMLU

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse85.3%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse79.2%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • CMMLU

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse84.3%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • C-Eval

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse85.8%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA-D

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse69.5%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B85.8%
    Source

    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B leads this result

  • MMLU-Redux

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B89.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B85.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • MATH-500

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse95.8%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B98.8%
    Source

    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B leads this result

  • AIME26

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse65.7%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B95.8%
    Source

    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B leads this result

  • HMMT Feb 2026

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse40.5%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • IMOAnswerBench

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse49.4%
    Source
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

    Not directly comparable

  • GSM8K

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B96.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • AIME 2025

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B95%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • CharXiv (overall)

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B80.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • A-OKVQA

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B86.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OmniDocBench 1.6

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B89.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • RealWorldQA

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B80.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OCRBench V2

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B56.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFEval

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B91.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • IFBench

    LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse
    Ternary Bonsai 2 27B74%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Questions

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.

Which costs less, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 262K.

Related comparisons

Last updated September 18, 2026

Watch LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.