Capability
50.8/100
field median 56.3
#113 of 230 ranked models
Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.
Follow model changesReleased Sep 17, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 18, 2026 · How the score is built
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Share or export
Agentic ranks #59. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
21 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
50.8/100
field median 56.3
#113 of 230 ranked models
Price
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
input median $0.95
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 90 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
262Ktokens
field median 256,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #59 of 154Percentile 62ndWeight 22%3 benchmarksVerified | 49.9 | #59 of 154 | 62nd | 22% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #64 of 154Percentile 59thWeight 20%4 benchmarksVerified | 49.9 | #64 of 154 | 59th | 20% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank #78 of 184Percentile 58thWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 50.6 | #78 of 184 | 58th | 12% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%4 benchmarksVerified | 76.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%5 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 5 benchmarks | Verified |
| Inst. FollowingRank #64 of 124Percentile 49thWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 71.0 | #64 of 124 | 49th | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score60.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap35.2 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Score90.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 93.2% | Gap3.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| BigCodeBench | Score58.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 58.1% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score52.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: SWE-2 · 92.8% | Gap40 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsτ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | Score80.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.4 · 98.9% | Gap18.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| BFCL v3Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard v3 | Score74.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 74.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score52.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: SWE-2 · 92.8% | Gap40 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score85.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Gap10.2 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
| MMLU-Redux | Score89.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 95% | Gap5.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score85.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0% | Gap10.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26AIME 2026 | Score95.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GLM-5.2 · 99.2% | Gap3.4 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Provider exact |
| GSM8KGrade School Math 8K | Score96.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 96.7% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MATH-500MATH-500 Problem Set | Score98.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 98.8% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025 | Score95% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 97% | Gap2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CharXiv (overall)CharXiv Descriptive and Reasoning Combined | Score80.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 80.0% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| A-OKVQAA Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge | Score86.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 86.8% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| OmniDocBench 1.6OmniDocBench v1.6 | Score89.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 89.1% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| RealWorldQA | Score80.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5% | Gap8.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| OCRBench V2 | Score56.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 74.2% | Gap17.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchInstruction Following Benchmark | Score74% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85% | Gap11 behind | WeightWeighted 70% | Provider exact |
| IFEvalInstruction-Following Eval | Score91.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5-27B · 95% | Gap3.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersThe sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Jul 14, 2026
Ternary Bonsai 27BNot publicly ranked · Price not listed
Sep 17, 2026 · you are here
Ternary Bonsai 2 27BScore 50.8 · Price not listed
27b
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #113 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 50.78/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is a open weight model with a 262K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Prism ML publishes Ternary Bonsai 2 27B under Apache 2.0 as a self-host checkpoint. The GGUF release ships two packings of the language model, PTQ1_0 at 1.76 bits per weight (5.93 GB) and PQ2_0 at 2.16 bits per weight (7.25 GB), plus an optional mmproj vision tower; an MLX 2-bit package is published for Apple silicon. Backends are llama.cpp/CUDA and MLX, with the full 262K context.
Its explicit predecessor is Ternary Bonsai 27B. 21 of 446 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #59, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #78. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Prism ML · Model release
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Ternary Bonsai 2 27B in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #113 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 50.78/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 21 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #78 out of 184 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 50.6/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #64 out of 154 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 49.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #59 out of 154 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 49.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ranks #64 out of 124 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 71/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is an open-weight model from Prism ML. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
No. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B currently has 22 source-displayable rows across 446 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has a documented context window of 262K. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Related resources
Last updated September 18, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.