Skip to main content

Model comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs A.X series

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
SK Telecom
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and A.X series share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 0 to A.X series.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
A.X series only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MAI-Thinking-1 and A.X series is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for A.X series yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

MAI-Thinking-1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 64K for A.X series.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA.X seriesNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA.X seriesNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA.X seriesNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMAI-Thinking-1256KA.X series64KMAI-Thinking-1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1A.X seriesResult
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare MAI-Thinking-1 and A.X series on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.