Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs MiniMax M2.7

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
64.11/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct unranked (Not scored); MiniMax M2.7 #36 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and MiniMax M2.7 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct; 34 to MiniMax M2.7.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
4
MiniMax M2.7 only
34
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and MiniMax M2.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and MiniMax M2.7
CategoryMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructΔMiniMax M2.7
AgenticMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M2.757.0
CodingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M2.753.3
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9MarginNo overlapMiniMax M2.7Not measured
Inst. FollowingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8MarginNo overlapMiniMax M2.7Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableMiniMax M2.7$0.3 input / $1.2 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableMiniMax M2.745 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableMiniMax M2.72.53 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128KMiniMax M2.7200KMiniMax M2.7 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
BFCL v4Source 44.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 57%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 84.8%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 46.3%Not comparable
MLE-Bench LiteSource 66.6%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 62.7%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 48.7%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 25.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 10.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1158Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 40.40%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
SWE-bench Verified*Source 75.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.2%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 51.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 76.5%Not comparable
Multi-SWE BenchSource 52.7%Not comparable
VIBE-ProSource 55.6%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 39.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 27.04%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 71.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 52.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 47.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
AA-LCRSource 68.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
MMLU-ReduxSource 78.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 40.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 40.9%87.0%MiniMax M2.7 leads
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 80.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 38.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 28.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 0.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 26.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 34.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 80.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1275Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructMiniMax M2.7Result
IFEvalSource 75.8%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 75.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and MiniMax M2.7 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and MiniMax M2.7 today?

MiniMax M2.7: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.