Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-74B-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
0 category wins1 category wins

Evidence parity. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and ZAYA1-74B-Preview share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct; 5 to ZAYA1-74B-Preview.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
3
ZAYA1-74B-Preview only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct makes more sense if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; ZAYA1-74B-Preview is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and ZAYA1-74B-Preview finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

ZAYA1-74B-Preview is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. ZAYA1-74B-Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and ZAYA1-74B-Preview
CategoryMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructΔZAYA1-74B-Preview
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9Margin 25.2ZAYA1-74B-Preview66.1
CodingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapZAYA1-74B-Preview53.2
MathMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapZAYA1-74B-Preview76.4
Inst. FollowingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8MarginNo overlapZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructB · ZAYA1-74B-Preview
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 40.9%B 57.3%
    Winner: ZAYA1-74B-PreviewΔ 16.4
    GPQA: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%; ZAYA1-74B-Preview scored 57.3%. ZAYA1-74B-Preview wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableZAYA1-74B-Preview$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128KZAYA1-74B-Preview256KZAYA1-74B-Preview lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewResult
BFCL v4Source 44.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench AirlineSource 56.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewResult
LiveCodeBench v6Source 65.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 53.2%Not comparable
KnowledgeZAYA1-74B-Preview wins
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewResult
MMLU-ReduxSource 78.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 40.9%57.3%ZAYA1-74B-Preview leads
GPQA-DSource 40.9%57.3%ZAYA1-74B-Preview leads
MMLU-ProSource 68.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewResult
AIME26Source 76.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructZAYA1-74B-PreviewResult
IFEvalSource 75.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and ZAYA1-74B-Preview are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

ZAYA1-74B-Preview has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 40.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.