Skip to main content

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

VS

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

49

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
69.9vs53.5

+16.4 difference

Knowledge

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
57.6vs75.5

+17.9 difference

Inst. Following

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
76.5vs74.2

+2.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 59 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 69.9 against 53.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 57.6% to 72.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 57.6% and 72.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 53.5. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 76.5 versus 74.2. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.