Skip to main content

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

VS

Nemotron 3 Ultra

63

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked · Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Nemotron 3 Ultra
69.9vs74.2

+4.3 difference

Knowledge

Nemotron 3 Ultra
57.6vs62.6

+5.0 difference

Inst. Following

Nemotron 3 Ultra
76.5vs81.7

+5.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Nemotron 3 Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Nemotron 3 Ultra's sharpest advantage is in instruction following, where it averages 81.7 against 76.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 57.6% to 87%.

Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 57.6% and 87%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.6 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.2 versus 69.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 76.5. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.