Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked (Not scored); Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct #186 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking; 4 to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only
5
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking128KQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
BFCL v4Source 45.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
AA-SciCodeSource 27.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
MMLU-ReduxSource 86.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 57.6%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 57.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 41.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructResult
IFEvalSource 76.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct today?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.