Skip to main content

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs Qwen3.5-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

VS

Qwen3.5-27B

62

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked · Qwen3.5-27B #21

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
69.9vs63

+6.9 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-27B
57.6vs80.6

+23.0 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.5-27B
76.5vs95

+18.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Qwen3.5-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Qwen3.5-27B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 62 versus 59. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.5-27B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 80.6 against 57.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 57.6% to 85.5%. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.5-27B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 57.6% and 85.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.5-27B?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 63. Qwen3.5-27B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 95 versus 76.5. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.