Skip to main content

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

VS

Qwen3.6 Plus

67

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked · Qwen3.6 Plus #15

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
69.9vs64.8

+5.1 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6 Plus
57.6vs66

+8.4 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.6 Plus
76.5vs87.8

+11.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Qwen3.6 Plus

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Qwen3.6 Plus is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6 Plus's sharpest advantage is in instruction following, where it averages 87.8 against 76.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 57.6% to 90.4%. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 57.6% and 90.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 64.8. Qwen3.6 Plus stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87.8 versus 76.5. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.