Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported); MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share 15 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5-Pro; 4 to MiMo-V2-Flash.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 15
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 16
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 70.19 to 54.06. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Δ | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0 | Margin→ 36.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 |
| Coding | MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2 | Margin→ 16.2 | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1265 | 833 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 72.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 68.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 29.1% | 12.0% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | 83.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 38.3% | 16.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 62.70% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 873 | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 38.2% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 43.2% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 65.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Flash wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Flash wins11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 48% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 34% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.2% | 24.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.6% | 65.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 33.8% | 8.0% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.6% | -48.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 22.6% | 15.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 24.5% | 75.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 38.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 83.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 84.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1298 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 79.9% | 39.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 70.19 to 54.06.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 57.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.