Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
85
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
48
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Coding
+3.7 difference
Knowledge
+27.5 difference
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
256K
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 85 to 48. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 57.2 against 53.5. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 85 to 48.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 57.2 versus 53.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.