Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
84
Ornith-1.0-35B
67
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-35B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+4.2 difference
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Ornith-1.0-35B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-35B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 84 to 67. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 64.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 68.4% to 64.2%.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ornith-1.0-35B.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 67. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 68.4% and 64.2%.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 64.2. Inside this category, Claw-Eval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.