Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 30 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5-Pro; 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 30
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 74 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1265 | — | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 72.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 68.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 29.1% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 38.3% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 62.70% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 873 | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 38.2% | — | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 57.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 68.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 60.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 43.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 50.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | 65.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HumanEvalSource | — | 73.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
KnowledgeSoofi S 30B-A3B wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 48% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 34% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 33.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 22.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 24.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 38.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8KSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1302 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 79.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 74 to 45.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Soofi S 30B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.9 versus 48. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.