Skip to main content

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Xiaomi
58.62/100
Margin
4.6pts
← winning
54.06/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 19 to MiMo-V2-Flash.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
MiMo-V2-Flash only
19
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

MiMo-V2.5 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 58.62 to 54.06. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiMo-V2.5Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiMo-V2.5Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiMo-V2.5Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash2.14 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2-Flash256KMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 12.0%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 16.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 833Not comparable
CodingMiMo-V2-Flash wins
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
AA-LCRSource 31.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
GPQASource 83.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 84.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 65.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 8.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -48.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 75.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
AIME 2025Source 94.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2-FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 58.62 to 54.06.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.